The Mistake Is Mine. I Am Not the Mistake.

Published on 7 September 2026 at 09:04

When I make a mistake, I admit it.

I do not look for a softer word.

I do not search for somebody else to carry part of it.

I do not build an explanation designed to protect my ego.

If the mistake is mine, I say so.

But there is an equally important distinction:

The mistake is mine. I am not the mistake.

Taking responsibility does not mean allowing one wrong decision to define my value, my ability or everything I have done before it.

That would not be accountability.

It would be confusion.

There are two ways to avoid learning: 

The first is denial.

We minimise what happened, defend the decision, blame the circumstances or search for someone who made a larger mistake than ours.

The objective is no longer to understand reality.

It is to protect our image.

The second is self-condemnation.

We move from:

“I made the wrong decision”

to:

“I am incapable.”

From:

“This did not work”

to:

“I always ruin everything.”

It may look like taking responsibility, but it is not.

It turns a specific event into a judgment about the entire person—and makes analysis almost impossible.

Denial protects the ego by rejecting the mistake.

Self-condemnation protects us from the harder work of understanding it.

Neither produces progress.

Admit it. Then examine it.

Saying “I was wrong” is honest, is not weakness. 

But honesty must lead somewhere.

The next question is not:

“Who can I blame?”

And it is not:

“What is wrong with me?”

It is:

“Why did this happen?”

What information was missing?

Which assumption proved incorrect?

Did I ignore something I should have noticed?

Did I react emotionally instead of looking at the facts?

Was the preparation insufficient?

Or did the structure allow the same weakness to appear again?

These questions do not reduce responsibility.

They make responsibility useful.

Because once I understand the reason, I have more information than I had before the mistake.

I can correct the situation faster.

I can change the process.

I can make a more accurate next decision.

And, most importantly, I can reduce the possibility of returning to exactly the same problem.

An error should change something

Simply feeling bad about a mistake does not make us responsible.

Neither does apologising repeatedly while continuing in the same way.

An error becomes valuable only when it changes something in how we think, prepare or act.

Perhaps we need a better question before deciding.

A clearer boundary.

A more honest conversation.

A different process.

More attention to a signal we previously ignored.

The solution will not always be immediate.

But the mistake must become information.

Otherwise, we have suffered the consequence without receiving the lesson.

Structure allows us to face the truth

This is why the structure we build inside ourselves matters.

Principles.

Values.

Self-awareness.

The ability to separate a fact from the story fear creates around it.

That structure does not prevent every mistake.

It prevents the mistake from destroying our clarity.

It allows us to say:

“Yes, I did this.”

“No, I will not hide from it.”

“And no, I will not become it.”

From there, we can move.

This applies in sport, in business, inside a team and in private life.

The context changes.

The responsibility does not.

The most honest way to face any mistake is to recognise it without excuses, examine it without fear and use it without allowing it to define us.

I do not need to protect my ego from the truth.

I need to protect my ability to learn from it.

The mistake is mine.

The information is now mine too.

And so is the responsibility for what I do next.

Silvia

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.