The presentation was excellent.
Then someone asked a question halfway through, and the speaker could no longer find their place.
That changes what I want to understand about the preparation.
Had they learned the subject well enough to explain it from different starting points? Or had they learned one very effective route through it?
Both can produce an impressive presentation. An interruption reveals the difference.
I find this interesting because we often judge a skill in the circumstances where we have practised it most. The familiar sequence. The usual setting. Enough time to think. People whose reactions we already understand.
Those conditions become part of the performance, sometimes without us noticing.
In equestrian sport, this question becomes particularly concrete. The horse is a living being, and the response can vary. A familiar exercise still requires observation, timing and judgement. Knowing the intended sequence is only part of the work.
What interests me is how much understanding remains available when the expected response changes.
The same question applies elsewhere.
You can explain your idea beautifully with twenty minutes available. What happens when somebody asks for the essential point in two?
You can make a decision with complete information. What can you decide responsibly while one important detail is still missing?
You can answer a familiar question. Can you recognise the same problem when someone describes it differently?
These are useful ways to examine a capability.
For a presentation, practise beginning with the conclusion. Ask someone to interrupt with a genuine question. Explain the idea without relying on the slides.
Each variation gives you information about what you understand and what still depends on the sequence you rehearsed.
I would change one condition at a time. Otherwise, it becomes difficult to identify what created the difficulty. The purpose is to find something specific we can work on.
And when a variation exposes a gap, that is a useful discovery. We can return to the missing explanation, the unclear connection or the decision we had never actually practised making.
We cannot arrange for the world to reproduce our preferred conditions. We can choose how carefully we examine our own preparation.
After a successful performance, I like this question:
What could I still do well if one important detail changed?
The answer gives the next practice session somewhere useful to begin.
Once you have identified the gap, the next step is to make improvement specific.
Silvia
Add comment
Comments